Developing Collaborative Governance Capabilities for Sustainable Development at Santer Application in Samarinda City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/osc.v2i1.2463Keywords:
Collaborative capacity, collaborative governance, Samarinda City, Samarinda SanterAbstract
Governments, development organizations, and others must increase their ability to tackle the complex difficulties of sustainable development. Significant investments in governance networks are being made by non-governmental groups. Nevertheless, excitement for there isn't always empirical support for the establishment of governance networks. This disparity presents difficulties. These groups to determine the value of their time and effort spent investing in governance networks; an assessment that is very important when resources are few. We assess the using a qualitative case study conducted in Samarinda City. proportionate share that the Santer Program, a governance network, made to four Individual, relational, organizational, and institutional are dimensions of collaborative governance capacity. We discover that the network contributed only moderately to the capacity of the individual, the relationship, and the organization, but the institutional capacity held steady in spite of the network's existence. This research is a qualitative study that will be conducted by reviewing the literature and examining the existing facts and data. Based on these findings, we argue that governance networks are not a panacea. Continued efforts are needed to establish when, how, and in what contexts collaborative networks are effective for building collaborative capacity for sustainable development. It would be fruitful for future studies to investigate how collaborative capacity changed over time, and in particular if increases in collaborative governance ability persisted after the network had stopped.
Keywords: Collaborative Governance, Collaborative capacity, Samarinda City, Samarinda Santer
References
A. Munawaroh, M. F. Aziz, R. Ridhoi, T. D. Pramudito, and W. J. Pranoto, “Implementasi E-Government Berbasis Aplikasi Santer Dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Publik Di Kota Samarinda,” J. Insa. Pengabdi. Indones., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 72–80, 2023.
M. Fajar, A. Thoriq, H. Pratiwi, and A. Y. Rangan, “Analisis Website pada Samarinda Santer dengan Metode Usability Testing Website Analysis in Samarinda Santer with Usability Testing Method,” no. 25, pp. 1–8, 2024.
K. Emerson, T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh, “An integrative framework for collaborative governance,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2012, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur011.
K. Emerson, T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh, “An integrative framework for collaborative governance,” J Pub Admin Res Theory, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–29, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur011.
A. Feist, R. Plummer, and J. Baird, “The inner-workings of collaboration in environmental management and governance: a systematic mapping review,” Env. Manag, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 801–815, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01337-x.
F. Kern, K. S. Rogge, and M. Howlett, “Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies,” Res. Policy, vol. 48, no. 10, p. 103832, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2019.103832.
C. Park and J. Lee, “Stakeholder framing, communicative interaction, and policy legitimacy: anti-smoking policy in South Korea,” Policy Sci., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 637–665, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11077-020-09394-z.
C. Ansell and A. Gash, “Collaborative governance in theory and practice,” J Public Admin Res Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–571, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032.
M. O. Adisa, S. Oyedeji, and J. Porras, “The nexus between ICT, top-down and bottom-up approaches for sustainability activities: A systematic mapping study,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 449, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141768.
J. L. Blythe, P. J. Cohen, H. Eriksson, and D. Harohau, “Do governance networks build collaborative capacity for sustainable development? Insights from Solomon Islands,” Environ. Manage., vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 229–240, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01644-5.
P. G. Foster-Fishman, S. L. Berkowitz, D. W. Lounsbury, S. Jacobson, and N. A. Allen, “Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework,” Am J Community Psychol, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 241–261, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1023/a:1010378613583.
T. Bustomi, A. Ariesmansyah, and A. Kusdiman, “Partisipasi Publik Dalam Collaborative Governance Pada Program Sister City Bandung Dan Jepang Dalam Menanggulangi Sampah Di Kota Bandung,” Kebijak. J. Ilmu Adm., vol. 13, no. Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 48–64, 2022, doi: 10.23969/kebijakan.v13i1.5037.
R. P. Hanida, B. Irawan, and F. Rozi, “Dynamic Governance Capabilities in Regional Budget Policy Formulation to Create Agile Bureaucracy During Covid-19,” J. Manaj. Pelayanan Publik, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79–97, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.24198/JMPP.V5I1.34117.
S. Kitayama, N. P. Camp, and C. E. Salvador, “Culture and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multiple Mechanisms and Policy Implications,” Soc. Issues Policy Rev., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 164–211, 2022, doi: 10.1111/sipr.12080.
K. Emerson and A. K. Gerlak, “Adaptation in collaborative governance regimes,” Env. Manag, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 768–781, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0334-7.
Ö. Bodin, “Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems,” Science (80-. )., vol. 357, no. 6352, p. eaan1114, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1126/science.aan1114.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dyah Rahayuning Perwitasari, Dyah Kuntorini Dwi Angreni, Lara Ayu Lestari, Bulan Erika Bato, Iqbal Saputra Zana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
