Exercising A Case Study Research in Post-conflict Environment: Exploring the Struggle of the Coastal Farmer Union (PPLP) Opposing the Neoliberal Policy in the Kulon Progo Coastal Area, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/osc.v3i1.6998Keywords:
fieldwork, case study, research ethics, post-conflict environmentAbstract
Researching in a post-conflict context is challenging. Methodological issues such as research ethics and data-gathering approach are critical. The researcher must have appropriate measures to collect the data. My fieldwork, spanning five months, took place in six coastal villages in Kulon Progo, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. This site is the home to the Coastal Farmer Union (the PPLP), which rejected the government's mining plan from 2006 on. Coastal dwellers are mostly farmers who cultivate the coastal land. To obtain the data I used a qualitative research method with a single case study approach. Many challenges hinder my fieldwork, such as being expelled from the PPLP meeting, being intimidated and stigmatized, and experiencing fears, trauma, and stress. Therefore, I exercise agile data-collection strategies, be more concerned with research ethics, and be self-motivated. I utilized participant observation, snowball sampling, in-depth interviews, and political action to gain information about the coastal farmer resistance. I employed participant observation, snowball sampling, open-ended interviews, and political action to gather information on the coastal farmer resistance. I exercised political action to engage with the informants through writing and publishing their struggles in a zine organized by activists who support their struggle. This creates trust in the informants. Using these strategies, I obtained the data, and I built social capital with my informants. This paper discusses my thesis’s methodological approach and how to conduct fieldwork in a post-conflict environment.References
Barzelay, M., (1993) ‘The Single Case Study as Intellectually Ambitious Inquiry’, Journal of Public Administration Research, 3(3): 305–18.
Brannen, J. (2004) ‘Working qualitatively and quantitatively’ in Seale, C., Gobo G., Gubrium, J.F., and Silverman, D., eds., The SAGE: London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 282-296.
Brennen, B. (2017) Qualitative research methods for media studies. Second edition. New York; London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Coffey, A. (2018) Doing ethnography. London: Sage.
Cohen, N. and Arieli, T. (2011) ‘Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling’, Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), pp. 423–435. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311405698.
Donmoyer, R. (2000) ‘Generalizability and the Single-Case Study’ in Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. and Foster, P. eds., SAGE: London, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 45-68.
Eckstein, H. (2000) ‘Case Study and Theory in Political Science’ in Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. and Foster, P. eds., SAGE: London, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 119-164.
FitzGerald, J. and Mill, J. (2022) ‘The Importance of Ethnographic Observations in Grounded Theory Research’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 23(2), Art. 13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.2.3840.
Flyvbjerg, B., (2004) ‘Five misunderstandings about case-study research’ in Seale, C., Gobo G., Gubrium, J.F., and Silverman, D., eds., The SAGE: London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 390-404.
Gomm, R., Martin H., and Peter F. (2000) ‘Case Study and Generalization’ in Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. and Foster, P. eds., SAGE: London, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 98-115.
Haer, R. and Becher, I. (2012) ‘A methodological note on quantitative field research in conflict zones: get your hands dirty’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(1), pp. 1–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.597654.
Jorgensen, D.L. (2020) Principles, Approaches, and Issues in Participant Observation. New York: Routledge.
Leavy, P. (Ed.) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford library of psychology, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Lilja, M., Baaz, M. and Vinthagen, S. (2013) ‘Exploring “irrational resistance”’, Journal of Political Power, 6(2), pp. 201–217. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2013.809212.
Machin, D. (2002) Ethnographic Research for Media Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, Arnold.
Mazurana, D., Jacobsen, K. and Gale, L.A. eds. (2013) Research Methods in Conflict Settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McDowell, L. (2010) ‘Interviewing: Fear and Liking in the Field’ in
DeLyser, D., Herbert, S., Aitken, S., Crang, M. and McDowell, L., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography, SAGE: Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, 156-171.
Schensul, S.L., Schensul, J.J. and LeCompte, M.D. eds. (1999) Essential Ethnographic Methods: Ethnographer’s Toolkit, 7 volumes. Walnut Creek; Lanham; New York; Oxford: Altamira Press.
Spradley, J.P. (2011) The Ethnographic Interview. Nachdr. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth.
Spradley, J.P. (2011) Participant observation. Nachdr. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Stake, R.E. (2000) ‘The Case Study Method in Social Inquiry’ in Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. and Foster, P. eds., SAGE: London, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 19-26.
Watson, A. and Till, K.E. (2010) ‘Ethnography and Participant Observation’ in DeLyser, D., Herbert, S., Aitken, S., Crang, M. and McDowell, L., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography, SAGE: Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, 121-137.
Wood, E.J. (2006) ‘The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones’, Qualitative Sociology, 29(3), pp. 373–386. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8.
Yin, R.K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eka Zuni Lusi Astuti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
