Digital Transformation of E-court on Advocate Practices

Authors

  • Ramlan Universitas Jambi
  • Mardhatillah Universitas Bengkulu
  • M. Ilham Adepio Universitas Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33830/osc.v3i1.7030

Keywords:

Advocate, Case, E-court

Abstract

The high number of legal cases in Indonesia has made it difficult for courts to conduct trials. Efforts to increase the number of judges and courtrooms each year have not been sufficient to cope with the surge in cases. As a solution, the Supreme Court has implemented the digitisation of legal services through electronic courts (e-courts), which aim to facilitate parties to proceedings, including advocates, in online trials. This study analyses the impact of the implementation of e-court on the principles of justice and its influence on legal practice. Using a normative approach, the research method focuses on the study of positive legal norms in force to produce arguments, theories, or prescriptions as solutions to legal problems faced. The results of the study indicate that digitalisation through e-court does not alter the essence of judicial values but rather facilitates the conduct of court proceedings and assists lawyers in fulfilling their professional responsibilities. E-court facilitates lawyers in preparing and managing cases more efficiently, as well as providing better representation for their clients. Additionally, e-court offers convenience to the public by saving time and costs when registering and undergoing court proceedings.

References

[1] C. W. Persada and A. P. T. Zulkarnaen, “Reformasi Peradilan Perdata di Indonesia: Efektivitas Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa,” Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 1753, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.59141/JAPENDI.V6I4.7670.

[2] J. Jumadi and S. Sarah, “Transformasi Digital Sistem E-court dalam Modernisasi Persidangan Kasus Hukum Pidana, Perdata, dan Hukum Islam di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1986–2003, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.38035/JIHHP.V5I3.3381.

[3] A. D. Setiawan, Artaji, and S. A. Putri, “Implementasi Sistem E-Court dalam Penegakan Hukum di Pengadilan Negeri,” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 198–217, May 2021, doi: 10.23920/JPHP.V2I2.352.

[4] D. Latifiani, Yusriyadi, A. Sarono, E. W. Pudjirahayu, S. A. Widigdo, and N. A. Nugraha, “Implementation of Simple, Fast and Low-Cost Principles in E-Summons with the E-Court System,” Diponegoro Law Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 107–123, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.14710/DILREV.8.1.2023.107-123.

[5] Metode Penelitian Hukum : 1-9 / HKUM4306 / 3 SKS / Hartiwiningsih, Lego Karjoko Soehartono, Daryono (Editor), Megafury Apriandhini (Editor), Perpustakaan Universitas Terbuka. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://opac.ut.ac.id/detail-opac?id=40712&utm_source=chatgpt.com

[6] M. Muammar and I. Taufik, “Quo Vadis Penelitian Hukum: Sebuah Jalan Meluruskan Miskonsepsi Kecenderungan Arah Penelitian Hukum,” Jurnal USM Law Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 634–657, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.26623/JULR.V7I2.7917.

[7] Y. Arrasyid, “Book Review: Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Edisi Revisi),” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Kenegaraan (JIHK), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–58, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.46924/JIHK.V3I1.147.

[8] “Pangkas Birokrasi Ribet: Urgensi Transformasi Digital Bidang Hukum,” Hukumonline.com. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pangkas-birokrasi-ribet--urgensi-transformasi-digital-bidang-hukum-lt6710ddbf06ab8/

[9] “Wamenkum Sebut Transformasi Digital di Bidang Hukum Kian Mendesak,” Kementerian Hukum dan HAM DKI Jakarta. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://jakarta.kemenkum.go.id/berita-utama/wamenkum-sebut-transformasi-digital-di-bidang-hukum-kian-mendesak

[10] D. dkk Feliks, Konsep Standar Profesi Advokat Dalam Mewujudkan Advokat Profesional. Jakarta: PT Nas Media Indonesia, 2023.

[11] M. Sudikno, Teori Hukum. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pusaka, 2012.

[12] M. H. Dr. Riki Perdana Raya Waruwu, S.H., “JDIH Mahkamah Agung,” Laman Resmi Mahkamah Agung. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/129kmaskviii2019/detail

[13] M. Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 2010.

[14] A. Pasere, “Penerapan Asas Peradilan Sederhana pada Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Manado,” Lex Crimen, vol. 6, no. 6, Aug. 2017. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/16959

[15] Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003, Pasal 5, 2003. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/43018/uu-no-18-tahun-2003

[16] I. Atikah, “Implementasi E-Court dan Dampaknya Terhadap Advokat Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara di Indonesia,” Proceeding - Open Society Conference, p. 128, 2018. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.pt-bengkulu.go.id/berita/e-court-era-baru-

[17] “Sistem E-Court di Peradilan Dianggap Masih Memiliki Celah yang Merugikan,” JPNN.com. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.jpnn.com/news/sistem-e-court-di-peradilan-dianggap-masih-memiliki-celah-yang-merugikan

[18] “Bagaimana Implementasi e-Court di Indonesia?,” Kumparan.com. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://kumparan.com/richard-goenawan/bagaimana-implementasi-e-court-di-indonesia-1vKNo9CyQsd

[19] “Sejumlah Kelemahan Sidang Elektronik dalam Praktik,” Hukumonline.com. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/sejumlah-kelemahan-sidang-elektronik-dalam-praktik-lt5f40072ab9863

[20] “E-Court dalam Peradilan Pidana: Antara Inovasi dan Keadilan Substantif,” Media Sindent |Fakta & Realita. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mediasindent.com/e-court-dalam-peradilan-pidana-antara-inovasi-dan-keadilan-substantif/

Downloads

Published

03-12-2025