Equitable Digital Taxation for Inclusive Revenue Mobilization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/osc.v3i1.7038Keywords:
digital economy, digital taxation, equitable revenue, fiscal justice, social inclusionAbstract
The rapid expansion of the digital economy had outpaced the capacity of traditional tax systems, particularly in developing countries. Although digital platforms generated substantial income, their contributions to public finance remained limited due to jurisdictional and structural gaps in existing tax regimes. This study aimed to explore digital taxation not solely as a fiscal mechanism, but as a strategic policy tool to enhance social inclusion. A qualitative doctrinal and comparative legal method was employed to analyze global digital taxation trends and compare them with national practices in selected developing countries, with a focus on Indonesia. The study proposed a framework that integrated digital tax policy with inclusive development goals, grounded in the theories of fiscal justice and inclusive governance. The findings revealed that aligning tax policy with the digitalization of the economy could enhance equity and state capacity in delivering public services. The research concluded with a normative-analytical model that could assist policymakers in designing fair, socially responsive, and development-oriented digital tax systems in an increasingly digital global landscape.References
[1] Ž. Đorić, “Digitalisation of the economy and the issues of inequality in the global society,” International Journal of Economic Practice and Policy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 123–155, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.5937/skolbiz2-41090.
[2] K. Rong, “Research agenda for the digital economy,” Journal of Digital Economy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–31, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jdec.2022.08.004.
[3] F. Alfie Faj’ri, M. Amsal Sahban, H. Saragih, and P. J. Cyntia Kojongian, “Digital Economy and Business Transformation in Indonesia: An Exploration of Opportunities and Challenges,” Nomico, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 108–117, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.62872/xer5f812.
[4] D. Hanrahan, “Digitalization as a Determinant of Tax Revenues in OECD Countries: A Static and Dynamic Panel Data Analysis,” Athens Journal of Business & Economics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 321–348, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.30958/ajbe.7-4-2.
[5] G. Kusumabangsa, “EVALUATION OF VAT COLLECTION ON TRADING THROUGH ELECTRONIC SYSTEM,” Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 183–203, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.21002/jaki.2021.10.
[6] T. Hanappi, A. Jakubik, and M. Ruta, “Fiscal revenue mobilization and digitally traded products: Taxing at the border or behind it?,” J Policy Model, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 779–801, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2024.04.001.
[7] I. Kamil, S. Mareta, . L., . Y., and E. Suryadi, “The Effect of Indonesian Digital Service Tax, Financial Capability on Tax Evasion,” KnE Social Sciences, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.18502/kss.v8i12.13659.
[8] C. Elisabeth, “Analysis of VAT Policy Toward Overseas Digital Service Providers Through Consumer Regulatory Impact Assessment in Indonesia,” Golden Ratio of Taxation Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.52970/grts.v3i1.296.
[9] A. M. A. N. D. D. O.-C. G. A. N. D. F. Bonfigli, “Detection of Digital Law Issues and Implication for Good Governance Policy in Indonesia,” BESTUUR, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 22, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.20961/bestuur.v10i1.59143.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elvira Elvira, Susanto Susanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

