Legal Protection for Online Fraud Victims in the Context of Inclusive Digital Transformation in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/osc.v3i1.7039Keywords:
Online Fraud, Legal Protection, Cybercrime Victims, Inclusive Digital Transformation, Restitution, Legal GapAbstract
This study analyzes the legal protection framework for online fraud victims amidst the rapid digital transformation in Indonesia. Although digital development has fostered inclusive economic growth, it has also increased the public's vulnerability to cybercrime. This research finds that the existing legal framework, namely the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) and the Criminal Code (KUHP), remains partial and ineffective in ensuring the restoration of victims' rights. The current regulations primarily focus on criminal aspects and sanctions for perpetrators, while the mechanism for restitution or compensation for victims is often unclear and difficult to access. This research employs a normative legal research method with a descriptive-analytical approach, applying both a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Primary and secondary legal materials were analyzed qualitatively to identify legal gaps and formulate an ideal protection model. The analysis results show that victims face significant challenges in accessing justice, such as difficulties in evidence collection and perpetrator tracing, the low capacity of law enforcement officials, and limited public digital literacy. To address these issues, this article proposes a multidimensional solution. First, regulatory reforms are needed to focus on victims' rights and establish a more explicit duty of care for digital service providers. Second, enhancing the capacity of law enforcement in digital forensics and inter-agency collaboration is essential. Third, a stronger collaboration among the government, the private sector, and the public is required to build an integrated case reporting and handling system. Finally, inclusive digital transformation, supported by massive digital literacy campaigns, must serve as a fundamental foundation for creating a safe and equitable digital space for all citizens.References
1. Wahyudi, S. (2021). Dampak Penipuan Online terhadap Kepercayaan Publik di Era Digital. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media, 5(1), 45-58.
2. Hidayat, R. (2018). Kendala Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Penipuan Online di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 48(2), 221-236.
3. Santoso, B. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan Siber di Indonesia. Jurnal Law Review, 20(1), 1-15.
4. Sari, P. K. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Platform Digital dalam Penanggulangan Penipuan Online. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(3), 345-360.
5. Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
6. Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
7. Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
8. Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
9. Rudiyanto, R. (2025). Peran lembaga keuangan dalam mencegah jeratan pinjaman online ilegal. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Akuntansi Keuangan Bisnis Digital, 4(1), 229–240.
10. Yaqin, H., Heriyanto, & Dairani. (2024). Analisis yuridis perlindungan hukum terhadap korban tindak pidana penipuan dalam transaksi e commerce. MARAS: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3(1).
11. Zhang, C. J., Gill, A. Q., Liu, B., & Anwar, M. J. (2025). AI based Identity Fraud Detection: A Systematic Review.
12. Prabowo, D., & Santoso, R. (2020). Urgensi Regulasi Komprehensif dalam Menghadapi Kejahatan Siber di Era Transformasi Digital. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum*, 50*(1), 22-38.
13. Gunawan, A., & Hadi, S. (2021). Peran Platform E-commerce dalam Mencegah dan Menangani Kasus Penipuan Online di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 15(2), 89-104.
14. Nisa, K., Purwono, P., Handayani, O. P., & Setiawan, S. (2024). Peningkatan literasi digital: Edukasi kejahatan siber dan pinjaman online illegal MAN 2 Cilacap. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat – PIMAS, 4(2), 1–15.
15. Sri Andaiyani, Yunisvita, Yunisvita, T., & Pratiwi, M. (2023). Optimalisasi peran perguruan tinggi: Pentingnya literasi keuangan digital dalam mencegah cybercrime. Sricommerce: Journal of Sriwijaya Community Services, 4(2), 45–60.
16. Setiawan, B., & Mulyana, T. (2022). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Upaya Mitigasi Kejahatan Online Melalui Pelaporan Aktif. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 18(1), 1-15.
17. Sanusi, M. F., & Ariyanti. (2025). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban tindak pidana penipuan yang dilakukan oleh pelaku usaha e commerce berbasis transaksi elektronik. Merdeka Law Journal, 5(2), 171–178.
18. Hendrawan, A. R. et al. (2025). Perlindungan hukum bagi korban kejahatan digital dalam perspektif UU ITE dan KUHP. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 14(12), 71–80.
19. Maharani, F. P. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban penipuan online investasi ilegal menurut UU ITE (UU No.19/2016). Lex Privatum, 13(4)
20. Ekayani, L., & Djanggih, H. (2023). Perlindungan hukum nasabah terhadap kejahatan pencurian data pribadi (phishing) di lingkungan perbankan. Journal of Philosophy (JLP), 4, 22–40.
21. Samudra, A. H. (2019). Redressing the online transaction fraud victim treatment and interest fulfillment in criminal justice system. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(3), 650–656.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eka Wahyu Octaviana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

