Legal Framework for Inclusive Digital Transformation: Ombudsman Role in Ensuring Citizens Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/osc.v3i1.7061Keywords:
Legal Framework, Digital Transformation, Ombudsman, Protection of Citizens’ RightsAbstract
Digital transformation in public service delivery has become a central pillar of Indonesia’s national bureaucratic reform, promoting efficiency, transparency, and accountability. However, the acceleration of digitalization has not been adequately accompanied by legal instruments that explicitly uphold the principle of inclusivity, resulting in potential digital exclusion of vulnerable groups, including remote communities, the elderly, and persons with disabilities. This study identifies a legal vacuum regarding the absence of a clear, operational, and enforceable regulatory framework that mandates public service providers to guarantee digital accessibility and establish robust accountability mechanisms in the event of rights violations. Employing a normative juridical method, the research adopts statutory and conceptual approaches, and applies systematic and teleological interpretations of relevant legal norms—primarily Law No. 25/2009 on Public Services and Law No. 37/2008 on the Indonesian Ombudsman. The analysis reveals the strategic oversight function of the Ombudsman in protecting citizens’ rights within digital public service ecosystems through: (1) handling and investigating reports of maladministration involving electronic-based systems; (2) initiating investigations into discriminatory practices or restrictions on digital access; and (3) issuing corrective recommendations to public service providers utilizing technology in a manner that undermines the principle of equality. The study concludes with a call for the reformulation of a binding legal framework to ensure that digital transformation in public services is conducted fairly and inclusively. Furthermore, it underscores the need to strengthen the institutional capacity and mandate of the Ombudsman as an independent supervisory authority within the national digital governance architecture.References
[1] I. Isabella, A. Alfitri, A. Saptawan, N. Nengyanti, and T. Baharuddin, “Empowering Digital Citizenship in Indonesia: Navigating Urgent Digital Literacy Challenges for Effective Digital Governance,” J. Gov. Public Policy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 142–155, 2024, doi: 10.18196/jgpp.v11i2.19258.
[2] E. Sutrisno, M. S. Silitonga, R. R. Yusuf, and A. A. Nugroho, “Digital divide: how is Indonesian public service affected?,” JPPI (Jurnal Penelit. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 454, 2024, doi: 10.29210/020244613.
[3] R. Jayanthi and A. Dinaseviani, “Kesenjangan Digital dan Solusi yang Diterapkan di Indonesia Selama Pandemi COVID-19,” J. IPTEKKOM J. Ilmu Pengetah. Teknol. Inf., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 187–200, 2022, doi: 10.17933/iptekkom.24.2.2022.187-200.
[4] G. H. Djatmiko, O. Sinaga, and S. Pawirosumarto, “Digital Transformation and Social Inclusion in Public Services: A Qualitative Analysis of E-Government Adoption for Marginalized Communities in Sustainable Governance,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1–28, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17072908.
[5] S. A. Wiraguna, “Metode Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum: Studi Eksploratif di Indonesia,” Public Sph. J. Sos. Polit. Pemerintah. dan Huk., vol. 3, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390.
[6] I. Amarini, Y. Saefudin, I. A. Kartini, Marsitiningsih, and N. Ismail, “Digital Transformation: Creating an Effective and Efficient Court in Indonesia,” Leg. J. Ilm. Huk., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 266–284, 2023, doi: 10.22219/ljih.v31i2.28013.
[7] M. Latif, “Digital Transformation in the Justice System: Enhancing Efficiency and Accessibility of Legal Services,” JIL J. Indones. Law, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 179–198, 2024, doi: 10.18326/jil.v5i2.
[8] M. M. Rohman, N. Mu’minin, M. Masuwd, and E. Elihami, “Methodological Reasoning Finds Law Using Normative Studies (Theory, Approach and Analysis of Legal Materials),” MAQASIDI J. Syariah dan Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 204–221, 2024, doi: 10.47498/maqasidi.v4i2.3379.
[9] Utami R, Kurniati I, Maya D, and Maulida J, “Digital Accessibility for Integrated and Inclusive Digital Public Services (1) (1),” no. January, 2025.
[10] R. Wasir et al., “Strengthening Health System Resilience through Digital Health: Challenges and Prospects in Indonesia’s Rural and Remote Regions - A Scoping Review Protocol,” Open Public Health J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2025, doi: 10.2174/0118749445393540250506115107.
[11] SMERU, “Accelerating Inclusive and Fair Digital Transformation to Anticipate Challenges Facing The Future of Work.,” SMERU Res. Institute., no. 1, 2023.
[12] R. Dwi Wahyunengseh, S. Hastjarjo, T. Mulyaningsih, and D. G. Suharto, “Digital Governance and Digital Divide: A Matrix of the Poor’s Vulnerabilities,” Policy Gov. Rev., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 152, 2020, doi: 10.30589/pgr.v4i2.296.
[13] S. Syamsiar, “The Role of Digitalization in Enhancing Public Service Effectiveness in Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Adm. Publik, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 465, 2023, doi: 10.26858/jiap.v13i1.51026.
[14] Open Government Indonesia, “Indonesia Open Government Partnership National Action Plan 2023-2024,” p. 77, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Indonesia_Action-Plan_2023-2024_EN.pdf
[15] I. Shahrash, R. Mirajiah, and N. Widyanto, “Digital Inclusion Strategies to Enhance Accessibility of Public Services in Indonesia,” J. Aktor, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 25, 2023, doi: 10.26858/aktor.v2i1.46918.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eka Dewi Kartika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
