A Scoping Review of Queer Paradox and Community in Online Spheres between 2015 and 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/osc.v3i1.7867Keywords:
Algorithmic profiling, Digital media, Intersectionality, Queer paradox, Queer subculturesAbstract
This study presents a systematic scoping review of research on queer paradox and community in online spheres published between 2015 and 2025. The review interrogates how digital platforms simultaneously function as emancipatory spaces that enhance queer visibility and as sites of surveillance, exclusion, and normative reproduction, thereby constituting the “queer paradox.” Guided by PRISMA protocols, 72 peer-reviewed articles were analyzed through thematic synthesis, focusing on the construction of queer identities, intersectional negotiations, and the dynamics of empowerment and oppression across digital environments. Findings reveal a significant growth of queer subculture scholarship, particularly in non-Western contexts, where digital technologies facilitate micro-communities that resist North-Atlantic paradigms of queerness. The review highlights three critical trends: the expansion of queer studies into diverse geographies, the predominance of qualitative methodologies such as thematic and discourse analysis, and the increasing scholarly attention to intersectionality, particularly regarding race, class, and gender modality. Nonetheless, the field remains constrained by methodological fragmentation, limited representation of transgender and nonbinary experiences, and Western dominance in knowledge production. This review underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary, context-sensitive approaches to theorizing digital queer cultures, with particular attention to ethical and political implications. By synthesizing empirical research across global contexts, the study contributes to developing more inclusive theoretical frameworks and provides directions for future scholarship, policy, and digital interventions aimed at fostering equitable queer participation in online spaces.
References
[1] K. Batra, “Worlding Sexualities under Apartheid: From Gay Liberation to a Queer Afropolitanism,” Postcolonial Studies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 37–52, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/13688790.2016.1222857.
[2] G. Prestage et al., “Understanding Gay Community Subcultures: Implications for HIV Prevention,” AIDS Behav, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2224–2233, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1027-9.
[3] T. Hu and T. Liu, “Reclaiming and remediating space: The dynamics of queer presence in audio drama platform,” Convergence, 2024, doi: 10.1177/13548565241301277.
[4] G. Vijayakumar, “On the paradoxes of feminist praxis,” Dec. 01, 2023, John Wiley and Sons Inc. doi: 10.1111/anhu.12492.
[5] E. Chela, “Dancing with decolonial praxis: LBQ women and non-binary people’s subcultures in Lusaka, Zambia,” Gend Dev, vol. 31, no. 2–3, pp. 557–573, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13552074.2023.2249764.
[6] M. Judge, “Navigating paradox: Towards a conceptual framework for activism at the intersection of religion and sexuality,” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.4102/hts.v76i3.5997.
[7] N. Kouri-Towe, “Risk, Desire and Adaptation: The Paradox of Queer Solidarity and the Political Possibility of Death Under Neoliberalism and Homonationalism,” Somatechnics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 185–200, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.3366/soma.2017.0217.
[8] M. J. Eliason, “Queer Faculty in the Academy: Is It Getting Better?,” J Homosex, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 2507–2532, 2024, doi: 10.1080/00918369.2023.2252963.
[9] A. Zoli, K. Johnson, and E. Hazenberg, “Unsettling vulnerability: Queer and feminist interventions,” Aug. 01, 2023, SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.1177/09593535231194430.
[10] R. Fox, “Gays Against Groomers and the politics of digital ventriloquism,” Crit Stud Media Commun, 2024, doi: 10.1080/15295036.2024.2397533.
[11] J. Fathallah, “Is stage-gay queerbaiting? The politics of performative homoeroticism in emo bands,” Journal of Popular Music Studies, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 121–136, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1525/jpms.2021.33.1.121.
[12] T. Silva, “Subcultural Identification, Penetration Practices, Masculinity, and Gender Labels within a Nationally Representative Sample of Three Cohorts of American Black, White, and Latina/o LGBQ People,” Arch Sex Behav, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 3467–3483, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02285-9.
[13] C. Hamilton, “Mourning leather: Queer histories, vegan futures,” Mem Stud, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 303–315, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1750698019876001.
[14] K. K. Strunk and S. A. Shelton, “Querying queer quantitative educational research: a systematic literature review,” 2024, Routledge. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2024.2311195.
[15] K. L. Nadal, C. N. Whitman, L. S. Davis, T. Erazo, and K. C. Davidoff, “Microaggressions Toward Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Genderqueer People: A Review of the Literature,” May 03, 2016, Routledge. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1142495.
[16] A. N. de Lira and N. A. de Morais, “Resilience in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) Populations: An Integrative Literature Review,” Sexuality Research and Social Policy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 272–282, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s13178-017-0285-x.
[17] C. McFadden, “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Careers and Human Resource Development: A Systematic Literature Review,” Human Resource Development Review, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 125–162, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1534484314549456.
[18] S. J. Edge, “A subject ‘queer’-y: A literature review on subject access to LGBTIQ materials,” Serials Librarian, vol. 75, no. 1–4, pp. 81–90, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/0361526X.2018.1556190.
[19] W. Ginder and S. E. Byun, “Past, Present, and Future of Gay and Lesbian Consumer Research: Critical Review of the Quest for the Queer Dollar,” Psychol Mark, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 821–841, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1002/mar.20821.
[20] W. Ginder and S. E. Byun, “Past, Present, and Future of Gay and Lesbian Consumer Research: Critical Review of the Quest for the Queer Dollar,” Psychol Mark, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 821–841, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1002/mar.20821.
[21] J. G. L. Lee, T. Ylioja, and M. Lackey, “Identifying lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender search terminology: A systematic review of health systematic reviews,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 5, May 2016, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156210.
[22] M. I. Suárez, S. M. Meister, and A. L. Lindner, “Envisioning queer curricula: A systematic review of LGBTIQ + topics in teacher practitioner literature,” J LGBT Youth, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 239–255, 2021, doi: 10.1080/19361653.2019.1705223.
[23] W. J. Hall, H. C. Dawes, and N. Plocek, “Sexual Orientation Identity Development Milestones Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Oct. 21, 2021, Frontiers Media S.A. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753954.
[24] J. Garcia-Perez, “Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer + Latinx youth mental health disparities: A systematic review,” J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 440–478, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10538720.2020.1764896.
[25] D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement,” Aug. 08, 2009. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535.
[26] L. Wahyudi, “Watase Uake: Research Collaboration Tools,” 2024.
[27] E. M. Lasda Bergman, “Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar,” 2012.
[28] E. Hariningsih, B. Haryanto, L. Wahyudi, and C. Sugiarto, “Ten years of evolving traditional versus non-traditional celebrity endorser study: review and synthesis,” Management Review Quarterly, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11301-024-00425-0.
[29] R. Pitkin, “The Hirschfeld horoscope: Archival trails and urban subcultures,” Apr. 01, 2022, John Wiley and Sons Inc. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.22169.
[30] C. Bonner-Thompson, “Queering digital temporalities? Visceral geographies of Grindr,” Geoforum, vol. 144, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103815.
[31] K. Brewster, “Network breakdown: the queer anarchist politics at the heart of the ‘net from FidoNet to HOMOCORE,” Internet Histories, 2024, doi: 10.1080/24701475.2024.2424609.
[32] X. Chen, “Reframing queer pop through media paratexts: translation of Chinese TV drama World of Honor in cyberspace,” Translation Studies, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 346–360, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14781700.2023.2219264.
[33] D. L. T. Chui and L. S. Chan, “Boys’ Love as Conditional Resilience: How Gay and Bisexual Men from Hong Kong Consume Boys’ Love,” Sex Cult, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s12119-024-10309-w.
[34] J. D. Franklin, A. Bourne, and A. Lyons, “Characteristics and functions of subcultural identities in the lives of gay, bisexual, and queer-identifying men in Australia,” Psychol Sex, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 459–473, 2022, doi: 10.1080/19419899.2020.1856172.
[35] A. Tom, “Exploring transness through the graphic memoir: Bishakh Som on crafting Spellbound: A Graphic Memoir,” 2024, Routledge. doi: 10.1080/21504857.2024.2441156.
[36] J. Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1989.
[37] T. Hu, J. Jin, and L. Liao, “A Transmedia ‘Third’ Space: The Counterculture of Chinese Boys’ Love Audio Dramas,” Asian Stud Rev, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 836–854, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10357823.2023.2211223.
[38] A. Siverskog and J. Bromseth, “Subcultural Spaces: LGBTQ Aging in a Swedish Context,” Int J Aging Hum Dev, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 325–340, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0091415019836923.
[39] M. F. Trzeciak and M. Busche, “‘For us it’s our life!’ – Queer utopian imaginaries in times of pandemic,” Sexualities, 2024, doi: 10.1177/13634607241307917.
[40] T. Love, “Temporal Displacement in Ulrike Ottinger’s Films,” Germanic Review, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 310–323, 2022, doi: 10.1080/00168890.2022.2121637.
[41] L. Segal, “Promoting dissident collectivities: Celebrating Alan Sinfield,” Textual Pract, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1089–1103, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1080/0950236X.2016.1209947.
[42] G. Hartal and O. Sasson-Levy, “Re-Reading Homonationalism: An Israeli Spatial Perspective,” J Homosex, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1391–1414, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1375364.
[43] E. Jaurand, “The sexualisation of public spaces in gay subculture: Territorial construction among males; [La sexualisation des espaces publics dans la subculture gay: Entre-soi masculin et territorialisation],” Geographie et Cultures, vol. 95, pp. 29 – 58, 2015, doi: 10.4000/gc.4089.
[44] M. Du Plessis and K. Chapman, “Queercore: The Distinct Identities of Subculture,” 1997. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25099625
[45] B. Congdon, “True Men and Queer Spaces in Truman Capote’s Answered Prayers,” Critique - Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 484–497, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1080/00111619.2017.1317233.
[46] A. J. Greteman and S. Stiegler, “The Emergence and Persistence of Queerness: Conversing Through Visual Culture Within a Generation,” J Homosex, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 653–668, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1423218.
[47] M. G. F. Worthen and T. M. Haltom, “Fifty Shades of Leather and Misogyny: An Investigation of Anti-Woman Perspectives among Leathermen,” Deviant Behav, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1565–1581, 2021, doi: 10.1080/01639625.2020.1762454.
[48] J. McBrinn, “Queer Hobbies: Ernest Thesiger and Interwar Embroidery,” Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 292–323, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14759756.2017.1294827.
[49] E. Medhurst, “Lesbian Knitting: From Self-Sufficiency to Self-Representation,” Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14759756.2022.2082122.
[50] D. Clyde, “Flying on borrowed feathers: identity formation among gender-variant anime fans in the U.S,” Fem Media Stud, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1050–1053, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2021.1959371.
[51] T. Hendriks, “Queer(ing) popular culture: homo-erotic provocations from Kinshasa,” Journal of African Cultural Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 71–88, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/13696815.2017.1341833.
[52] M. Capous-Desyllas and M. Johnson-Rhodes, “Collecting visual voices: Understanding identity, community, and the meaning of participation within gay rodeos,” Sexualities, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 446–475, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1363460716679801.
[53] Y. Y. Hu, “Mainstreaming female masculinity, signifying lesbian visibility: The rise of the zhongxing phenomenon in transnational Taiwan,” Sexualities, vol. 22, no. 1–2, pp. 182–202, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1363460717701690.
[54] K. Shankar, “Spectral Trans Figures: The Ambiguous and Atemporal Hijra Body in Narcopolis,” Wasafiri, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 81–91, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02690055.2024.2277050.
[55] J. Phillips, “Tennessee Williams’ escapology and the heterotopia of ‘The Mysteries of the Joy Rio,’” Textual Pract, 2024, doi: 10.1080/0950236X.2024.2347247.
[56] C. J. Aldridge, “Rome-sacking and barebacking: longing, rhetoric, and revolution in Augustine and queer theory,” Theology and Sexuality, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 44–61, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13558358.2020.1854039.
[57] T. M. L. Kaufman, L. M. Lessard, and R. J. Watson, “Heterogenous associations between Gender-Sexuality Alliances and LGBTQ adolescents’ maladjustment across individual victimization level,” Journal of Research on Adolescence, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 890–898, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1111/jora.12844.
[58] K. Hindmarch-Watson, “Sex, Services, and Surveillance: The Cleveland Street Scandal Revisited,” Hist Compass, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 283–291, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1111/hic3.12313.
[59] H. Bauer, “In the Canine Archives of Sex: Radclyffe Hall, Una Troubridge and their Dogs,” Gend Hist, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 994–1011, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1111/1468-0424.12634.
[60] E. Ben Hagai and L. House-Peters, “Susan Stryker on solidarity: An interview for the Journal of Lesbian Studies,” 2024, Routledge. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2022.2133419.
[61] E. T. Njoku, “Queering Terrorism,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 888–910, 2024, doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2021.2016514.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tuhfatul Mubarokah Assalamah, Rahma Sugihartati, Muhammad Saud, Nadira Aisha Hananto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

