Examining Sustainable Design through Experimentation: The Effects of Information Precision, Training, and Experience
Keywords:
cost precision, environmental training, sustainable design decision, experimentAbstract
This study examines how cost information precision, environmental training, and designer experience jointly impact sustainable design decisions in the context of new product development (NPD). Using a between-subjects factorial experiment with undergraduate accounting students as proxies for product designers, participants were tasked with designing an eco-friendly dollhouse using LEGO blocks for a hypothetical company. The results reveal that while cost information precision, environmental training, and experience alone do not significantly influence sustainable design, their interactions do. Specifically, the interaction between cost information and environmental training significantly affected design outcomes, with environmentally trained participants showing a stronger sensitivity to precise cost information when making sustainable choices. Furthermore, a significant three-way interaction suggests that a combination of environmental training, designer experience, and precise cost data significantly enhances sustainable design decisions. These findings underscore the importance of an integrated approach to sustainable NPD, suggesting that firms can foster sustainable design by combining cost management practices with targeted environmental training programs and support for designers at various experience levels. Limitations and recommendations for future research are discussed.
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Hughes, R., & Gibson, S. (1991). Students as surrogates for managers in a decision-making environment: An experimental study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(2), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1991.11517934
Jansen, S., Grosse, R., & Strohschneider, S. (2019). The impact of cost information on sustainable design decisions: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1241-1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.157
Jansen, L., van der Linde, C., & Driessen, P. H. (2019). The effect of cost information on eco-design decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 1161-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.092
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
McMahon, C. A., & Rosen, H. (2020). Cost information and environmental innovation: A behavioral perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2019-0256
Tischner, U., de Hollander, M., & Schot, J. (2019). Design for sustainability: The role of designers in sustainable product development. Journal of Design Research, 17(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2019.10020560
Wong, C. W. Y., Wong, Y. H., & Li, M. H. (2020). The impact of environmental training on the innovation capabilities of firms. Sustainability, 12(5), 1898. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051898
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Salsabila Khusnul Sulistyani, Dyah Ekaari Sekar Jatiningsih

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.