Joint effect of cost information usage and environmental practices in circular economy context

Authors

  • Satria Bagus Pamungkas Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Sahya Marlita Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Dyah Ekaari Sekar Jatiningsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Keywords:

cost usage, environmental practices, circular economy

Abstract

Grounded in decision-making theory and sustainability-focused design principles, this research addresses a critical gap in understanding how financial data precision and sustainable practices together influence environmentally conscious design decisions. This study examines the combined effects of cost information precision and environmental innovation practices on circular product design within new product development (NPD) settings. Utilizing a 2x2 between-subjects factorial design, we conducted a laboratory experiment. Results from a two-way ANOVA revealed no significant main effects for cost information precision or environmental innovation practices independently; however, a marginally significant interaction effect indicated that participants exposed to both precise cost information and environmental practices achieved higher circularity scores than those in other conditions. This interaction suggests that while cost precision or sustainable training alone may not significantly impact circular design choices, their combination has the potential to drive stronger alignment with circular economy goals. These findings align with theories suggesting that integrated information and practice approaches better support complex, sustainable decision-making processes. Implications for industry suggest that organizations aiming to promote sustainable design should consider the synergistic role of precise financial data and environmental innovation training to effectively encourage circular product development. Limitations include the use of student participants as design proxies and a laboratory setting, which may affect generalizability to professional design contexts. Future research should extend these findings by examining other designer attributes, such as personal sustainability values, and by validating these insights with professional designers in real-world NPD environments. This research contributes to sustainable design literature by offering insights into how combined cost management and environmental training can encourage circularity in product development.

References

Ashton, R. H., & Kramer, S. S. (1980). Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: Some evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490409

Bocken, N. M., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124

Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0

Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007

Ko, J., Guedes, G. B., Badurdeen, F., Jawahir, I., Morris, K., Ferrero, V., Hapuwatte, B., et al. (2024). A critical analysis of circular product attributes and limitations of product circularity assessment methods. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 23, 200219. 10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200219.

Lieder, M., Rashid, A., 2016. Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 115, 36–51.

Lindahl, M., & Tingström, J. (2001). A small textbook on environmentally adapted product development. Linköping University. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Division of Machine Design.

Preuss, L. (2005). Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: A view from the supply chain management function. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.437

Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). The Free Press.

Tukker, A., & Tischner, U. (Eds.). (2006). New business for old Europe: Product-service development, competitiveness, and sustainability. Greenleaf Publishing.

van den Berg, M. R., & Bakker, C. A. (2015). A product design framework for a circular economy. In Product Lifetimes And The Environment Conference Proceedings, Nottingham Trent University.

Verhulst, E., & Boks, C. (2014). Employee empowerment for sustainable design. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2014(55), 73-101. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.se.00007

Downloads

Published

2025-03-04

How to Cite

Pamungkas, S. B., Marlita, S., & Jatiningsih, D. E. S. (2025). Joint effect of cost information usage and environmental practices in circular economy context . Forum for University Scholars in Interdisciplinary Opportunities and Networking, 1(1), 812–817. Retrieved from https://conference.ut.ac.id/index.php/fusion/article/view/4592

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.