Actor Network Model in The Prevention of Village Financial Corruption

Authors

  • Mai Hendra Subiantoro Universitas Terbuka
  • Florentina Ratih Wulandari Universitas Terbuka

Keywords:

Prevention, Village Financial Corruption, Actor Network

Abstract

Village financial management can be a new epicenter of corruption. The findings of Indonesia Corruption Wacth (ICW) in 2023 showed that corruption in the village government sector was the most common corruption case compared to corruption cases in other sectors. Although the ratio of corruption cases is small compared to the number of villages in Indonesia, it could be an iceberg phenomenon where uncovered corruption cases are actually much more. Government agencies or institutions that are mandated according to laws and regulations to carry out control and prevention efforts are not running optimally to close the space and loopholes of corruption, so it is necessary to involve actors outside the government through the participation of community groups that have less access. To maximize the leverage of community involvement in corruption prevention, it is not enough to be partially played by each actor or community group, but networking is needed as an effort to build strength and legitimacy. Through the actor networks theory (ANT) approach, community involvement can be identified to formulate the role of actor networks in preventing corruption. The writing of this article uses a descriptive qualitative approach by using literature studies from various relevant sources. Based on the results of the actor network study in preventing corruption in village financial management, it is divided into 2 (two) clusters, namely primary and secondary actors. Where the community becomes an actor with a primary cluster because it can minimize gaps and spaces for corruption through control and supervision of the performance of village government administrators.

Keywords : Prevention, Village Financial Corruption, Actor Network

 

References

Agu, & Eneiga, &. (2024). Governance and Anti-Corruption Measures in Nigeria: Strategies for Enhancing Transparency, Accountability and Public Trust. International Journal of Economics and Public Policy | IJEPP, 8(1), 1–15.

Dedy Suryana, K. (2020). Peran Penting Tokoh Masyarakat Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha, 2(2), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.47532/jirk.v2i2.161

Emmy Ollong, Rukiah Latuconsina, Ali Tamrin Wasolo, B. (2021). Faktor Kriminologis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Desa Di Maluku. Aneka Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 24–37.

Epakartika, Nugraha, R., & Budiono, A. (2019). Peran Masyarakat Sipil dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Sektor Sumber Daya Alam. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 5(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i2-2.

Gong, T., & Yang, S. L. (2019). Corruption as an Elusive Concept. August, 1–20.

Goodin, R. E., Moran, M., & Rein, M. (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 1–1000). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001

Kopotun, I. M., Herasymenko, L. V, Tykhonova, O. V, Leonenko, M. I., Kateryna, V., Investigation, F., Law, I., Faculty, L., & Rih, K. (n.d.). Public control and counteraction to corruption offences by means of social communications and networks.

Makarova, M. (2019). Between The State And Civil Society : Anti- Corruption Discourse Of Movements And Non- Governmental Organisations In Russia. 11(3), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.2478/rsc-2019-0014

Martomo, Y. P. (2020). Actor Networks Theory Formulasi Kebijakan Penanganan Pengemis, Gelandangan dan Orang Terlantar (PGOT) Guna Mendukung Pariwisata Kota Surakarta. Proceeding SENDIU, 751–756. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

Meza, O., & Pérez-chiqués, E. (2020). Corruption Consolidation in Local Government: A Grounded Analytical Framework. Wiley, 99(3), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12698

Moerni, I. S., & Darmawan, A. (2021). PRAJA Observer: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021). 1(1), 51–58.

Nalyvaiko, I. (2022). The Role Of Civil Society Institutions In Preventing And Combating Corruption In Public Authorities. 27–30.

Peiffer, C., & Walton, G. (n.d.). Overcoming collective action problems through anti-corruption messages. February 2019.

Pratama, A. K., Badaruddin, B., & Kadir, A. (2021). Peran Badan Permusyawaratan Desa dalam Pengawasan Dana Desa. Perspektif, 10(2), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v10i2.4509

Rifaid, & Rusnaedy, Z. (2019). Collective Action NGO in Corruption Prevention of Government Procurement of Goods and Services in South Sulawesi Rifaid. Gorontalo Journal of Government and Political Studies, 2(2), 89–103.

Ryan, J. (2020). Peranan Jaringan Aktor Dalam Kebijakan Penanganan Covid-19 Di Indonesia. Journal Publicuho, 3(4), 491. https://doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v3i4.15380

Saptohutomo, A. P. (2024). ICW Ungkap Jumlah Kasus Korupsi di Desa Paling Tinggi. In Kompas.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/05/20/16442091/icw-ungkap-jumlah-kasus-korupsi-di-desa-paling-tinggi#:~:text=Menurut ICW%2C selama 2023 terdapat,dan perbankan (65 kasus).

Sustain.id. (2024). STAGNAN: Skor 34, Corruption Perception Index (CPI) Indonesia Tahun 2023. In Https://Sustain.Id/2024/02/05/Stagnan-Skor-34-Corruption-Perception-Index-Cpi-Indonesia-Tahun-2023/.

Transparency International Indonesia. (2024). Indeks Persepsi Korupsi: Pemberantasan Korupsi Kembali ke Titik Nol – Transparency International Indonesia. https://ti.or.id/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-2023-pemberantasan-korupsi-kembali-ke-titik-nol/

Tu, W., Yang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Influence of individual values on attitudes toward corruption: What undermine formal anticorruption effectiveness. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12402

Utomo, R., Slamet, K., Sulfan, S., Lintang Theodikta, M., & Sukma Dhaniswara, A. (2023). Analisis Jaringan Aktor: Upaya Pemerintah Mendorong Masyarakat Belanja Produk UMKM Lokal (Studi pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Cirebon Satu). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 009(01), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap/2023.009.01.4

Wijayanti, A., & Kasim, A. (2022). Collaborative Governance Strategi Nasional Pencegahan Korupsi (Stranas-PK) di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.858

Yansyah, F. A. (2021). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pelaksanaan Strategi Nasional Pencegahan Korupsi (Stranas PK). Yurispruden, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v4i2.10977

Zakariya, R. (2019). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pencegahan Korupsi Dana Desa: Mengenali Modus Operandi. INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.670

Zulfa, I., Akhmad Fandik, Ilyas Satriaji, & Dedy Oktavian. (2022). Model Collaborative Governance Dalam Pencegahan Korupsi Dana Desa Di Indonesia. Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial, 2(1), 107–139. https://doi.org/10.15642/sosyus.v2i1.155

Downloads

Published

2025-01-25

How to Cite

Hendra Subiantoro, M., & Ratih Wulandari, F. (2025). Actor Network Model in The Prevention of Village Financial Corruption. Forum for University Scholars in Interdisciplinary Opportunities and Networking, 1(1), 611–620. Retrieved from https://conference.ut.ac.id/index.php/fusion/article/view/4732

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.