Exploring Quillbot Application in Writing Skill: A Study at EFL Higher Education in Indonesia

Authors

  • Muliana Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Muh. Arief Muhsin Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Nur Intan Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Academic Writing, English Students

Abstract

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, particularly AI-powered paraphrase tools like QuillBot, have significantly influenced college writing practices. This study explores the impact of QuillBot on sixth-semester English students' academic writing at Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. Through qualitative methodology, involving interviews and document analysis, five students were examined to understand their frequency and methods of QuillBot use, its support in the writing process, effects on writing quality and originality, perceptions regarding its academic application, and confidence in its results. Findings reveal that QuillBot enhances productivity by expediting revisions and improving writing clarity and grammar, while preserving originality. However, students remain cautious about its ethical implications in academic assessments. This study contributes nuanced insights into AI's role in enhancing writing skills and underscores the need for ethical guidelines in its educational use. Future research should examine how QuillBot affects students with different levels of writing ability, ranging from beginner writers to advanced writers, providing insight into the benefits and limitations of this tool in supporting various learning needs.

References

Afrin, T., Kashefi, O., Olshefski, C., Litman, D., Hwa, R., & Godley, A. (2021). Effective Interfaces for Student-Driven Revision Sessions for Argumentative Writing. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445683

Aldabbus, S., & Almansouri, E. (2022). Academic Writing Difficulties Encountered by University EFL Learners. British Journal of English Language Linguistics, 10(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjel.2013/vol10n3111

Amanda Amanda, Elsa Muliani Sukma, Nursyahrina Lubis, & Utami Dewi. (2023). Quillbot As An AI-powered English Writing Assistant: An Alternative For Students to Write English. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sastra Inggris, 3(2), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v3i2.2026

Amyatun, R. L., & Kholis, A. (2023). Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) like QuillBot AI Assist Students’ Writing Skills? Assisting Learning to Write Texts using AI. ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 3(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v3i2.7533

Caprioglio, A. (2023). Fake academic writing: ethics during chatbot era. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 24(2), 89–89. https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2023.24.02.01

Conijn, R., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., Van Waes, L., & van Zaanen, M. (2022). How to provide automated feedback on the writing process? A participatory approach to design writing analytics tools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1838–1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839503

Dwi Putri, A. L., Tambusai, A., & Hasibuan, A. L. (2022). Students’ Difficulties in Acquiring English Writing. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v1i1.21

Fitria, T. N. (2021a). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1), 183. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233

Fitria, T. N. (2021b). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1), 183. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233

Fitria, T. N. (2022). Avoiding Plagiarism of Students’ Scientific Writing by Using the QuillBot Paraphraser. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 4(3), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i3.9917

Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5–24. http://doi.org/10125/73474

Hayes, J. (2018). The classroom. American Bee Journal, 158(7), 751–754.

Ishonqulov Sherzod Usmonovich. (2023). American Journal Of Philological Sciences THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY IN TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE SKILLS. 03(06), 66–72.

Jaladara, A. R., Jafar, M. B., & Salija, K. (2023). Quillbot Web-Application: Utilizing Online Technology on Academic Writing at an Indonesian Islamic Higher Education. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 3(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.51629/cjls.v3i2.152

Jian, L. (2022). Construction and Application of iWrite Artificial Intelligence Evaluation System for College English Writing. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1511153

KOCAMAN, O. (2022). Effects of Word Processing Tools on Improving Writing Skills in the Process of Learning a Foreign Language. Language and Technology, 4(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.55078/lantec.1178453

Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852

Latifah, S., Muth’im, A., & Nasrullah, N. (2024). The Use of QuillBot in Academic Writing. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 7(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v7i1.4047

Mallik, S. (2020). Application of Qualitative Research in Public Health. Journal of Comprehensive Health, 2(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.53553/jch.v02i02.008

McCarthy, K. S., Roscoe, R. D., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Checking It Twice: Does Adding Spelling and Grammar Checkers Improve Essay Quality in an Automated Writing Tutor? (pp. 270–282). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_23

Mosquera Gende, I. (2023). Digital tools and active leaning in an online university: Improving the academic performance of future teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(3), 632. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2084

Nurmayanti, N., & Suryadi, S. (2023). The Effectiveness Of Using Quillbot In Improving Writing For Students Of English Education Study Program. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v8i1.6392

Selfa-Sastre, M., Pifarré, M., Cujba, A., Cutillas, L., & Falguera, E. (2022). The Role of Digital Technologies to Promote Collaborative Creativity in Language Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828981

Syafitri, I. R., Hendra, T., & Gistituati, N. (2022). The Influence of Principal Leadership and Teacher Dicipline on Teacher Performance. Al-Fikrah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.31958/jaf.v10i1.6007

Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2021). College Students’ Time Management: a Self-Regulated Learning Perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1319–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z

Xuyen, N. T. (2023). Using the Online Paraphrasing Tool Quillbot to Assist Students in Paraphrasing the Source Information: English-majored Students’ Perceptions. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Teaching and Learning, 2022, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.150.3

Downloads

Published

2025-01-17

How to Cite

Muliana, Arief Muhsin , M., & Intan , N. (2025). Exploring Quillbot Application in Writing Skill: A Study at EFL Higher Education in Indonesia. Forum for University Scholars in Interdisciplinary Opportunities and Networking, 1(1), 203–211. Retrieved from https://conference.ut.ac.id/index.php/fusion/article/view/4635

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.