Inclusive Education Perspectives On Open And Distance Learners’ Article Publications
Keywords:
Article publication, Inclusive education, Open and distance educationAbstract
Universitas Terbuka learners, as primary participants in open and distance education, are required to publish scientific articles as a graduation prerequisite. Nevertheless, the diversity of UT learners’ backgrounds affects their readiness for publication. This study examines the factors that influence the success of UT learners in publishing scientific articles through the lens of inclusive education. This research employed a mixed-methods approach, specifically an explanatory sequential design. The findings indicate that the success of UT learners' scientific article publications is notably impacted by the various services and facilities offered by UT, viewed from an inclusive perspective that encompasses access to UT’s inclusive services, effective systems, and supportive social factors. These research findings serve as a reference for the ongoing development of pedagogical support, which will better equip UT learners with the knowledge and experience necessary to enhance their skills and facilitate their participation in the research community. Implementing tailored interventions and strengthening inclusive policies will further empower UT learners, thereby enhancing publication outcomes and supporting equitable academic achievement
References
Akinyode, B. F. (2018). The context of qualitative research technique. International Journal of Business and Educational Studies, 5(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v5.n3.267
Ali, P. A., & Watson, R. (2016). Peer review and the publication process. Nursing Open, 3(4), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.51
Bernard, R. M., de Rubalcava, B. R., & St-Pierre, D. (2000). Collaborative online distance learning: Issues for future practice and research. Distance Education, 21(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791000210205
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Croft, B., & Brown, M. (2020). Inclusive open education: Presumptions, principles, and practices. Distance Education, 41(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757410
Done, E. J., & Knowler, H. (2023). International perspectives on exclusionary pressures in education: How inclusion becomes exclusion. In A. Editor & B. Editor (Eds.), International perspectives on exclusionary pressures in education: How inclusion becomes exclusion (pp. xx–xx). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14113-3
Dunn, M. (2021). The challenges of struggling writers: Strategies that can help. Education Sciences, 11(12), Article 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120795
Egbert, S., & Camp, S. (2022). Enhancing technology-based distance education delivery using collaborative team-teaching methods. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 5(3, Special Issue), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.26077/62c5-c53c
Francavilla, M. L. (2018). Learning, teaching and writing with reference managers. Pediatric Radiology, 48(10), 1393–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4175-z
Goodrich, A. (2021). Online peer mentoring and remote learning. Music Education Research, 23(2), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2021.1898575
Hanafi, I., Kheder, K., Sabouni, R., Al-Nafouri, M. G., Hanafi, B., Alsalkini, M., Kenjrawi, Y., Albkhetan, H., & Alhalabi, M. (2025). Improving academic writing in a low-resource country: A systematic examination of online peer-run training. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 37(3), 388–402.
Iniesto, F., Tabuenca, B., Rodrigo, C., & Tovar, E. (2021). Challenges to achieving a more inclusive and sustainable open education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.679
Iskander, J. K., Wolicki, S. B., Leeb, R. T., & Siegel, P. Z. (2018). Successful scientific writing and publishing: A step-by-step approach. Preventing Chronic Disease, 15(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180085
Jung, I. (2019). Introduction to theories of open and distance education. In Open and distance education theory revisited (pp. 1–9). Springer.
Kadwa, M. S., & Alshenqeeti, H. (2020). The impact of students’ proficiency in English on science courses in a foundation year program. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 3(11), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt
Kahl, T. N., & Cropley, A. J. (1986). Face-to-face versus distance learning: Psychological consequences and practical implications. Distance Education, 7(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791860070104
Kara, M., & Can, G. (2019). Master’s students’ perceptions and expectations of good tutors and advisors in distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3674
Kardam, N., Misra, S., Anderson, M., Bai, Z., & Wilson, D. (2021). What do students need from other students? Peer support during remote learning. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--38042
Keaton, W., & Gilbert, A. (2020). Successful online learning: What does learner interaction with peers, instructors, and parents look like? Journal of Online Learning Research, 6(2), 129–154.
Kerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794775
Lapum, J., Bailey, A., St-Amant, O., Garmaise-Yee, J., Hughes, M., & Mistry, S. (2022). Equity, diversity, and inclusion in open educational resources: An interpretive description of students’ perspectives. Nurse Education Today, 116, 105490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105490
Li, Y. (2016). “Publish SCI papers or no degree”: Practices of Chinese doctoral supervisors in response to the publication pressure on science students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(4), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2015.1005050
Long, Y., & Aleven, V. (2013). Supporting students’ self-regulated learning with an open learner model in a linear equation tutor. In S. A. Cerri, W. J. Clancey, G. Papadourakis, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 7926. Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 219–228). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_23
Mallik, S., & Mallik, S. (2017). How to write and publish your article: Guidelines to the young researchers. Journal of Comprehensive Health, 5(1), 12–23.
Maphosa, C., & Bhebhe, S. (2019). Digital literacy: A must for open distance and e-learning (ODeL) students. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(10), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2560085
Maphoto, K. B., Sevnarayan, K., Mohale, N. E., Suliman, Z., Ntsopi, T. J., & Mokoena, D. (2024). Advancing students’ academic excellence in distance education: Exploring the potential of generative AI integration to improve academic writing skills. Open Praxis, 16(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.649
Mason, S., & Atkin, C. (2021). Capturing the struggle: Adult learners and academic writing. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(8), 1048–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1851663
McFarlane, K. J. (2016). Tutoring the tutors: Supporting effective personal tutoring. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616720
Nagy, J., & McDonald, J. (2007). New models for learning flexibility: Negotiated choices for both academics and students. In ASCILITE 2007 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 737–746).
Nigmatov, Z. G., & Nasibulov, R. R. (2015). Study of distance learning opportunities in inclusive education system. Social Sciences (Pakistan), 10(6), 817–820.
Nikčević, I., Krulj, J., Krulj-Mladenović, M., & Jokanović, V. (2021). Inclusion: Movement for open and fair education. Bizinfo Blace, 12(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.5937/bizinfo2101043n
Raitskaya, L., & Tikhonova, E. (2020). Pressure to publish internationally: Scholarly writing coming to the fore. Journal of Language and Education, 6(1), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10631
Ross, J., Head, K., King, L., Perry, P. M., & Smith, S. (2014). The personal development tutor role: An exploration of student and lecturer experiences and perceptions of that relationship. Nurse Education Today, 34(9), 1207–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.01.001
Sá, M. J., Santos, A. I., Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2021). Digital literacy in digital society 5.0: Some challenges. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0033
Schuller, A. (2017). Academic publishing. In History of Oxford University Press: Volume IV 1970 to 2004 (pp. 269–332). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574797.003.0011
Shamsi, A. F., & Osam, U. V. (2022). Challenges and support in article publication: Perspectives of non-native English speaking doctoral students in a “publish or no degree” context. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221095021
Slattery, E. L., Voelker, C. C. J., Nussenbaum, B., Rich, J. T., Paniello, R. C., & Neely, J. G. (2011). A practical guide to surveys and questionnaires. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 144(6), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811399724
Soydan Oktay, Ö. (2023). The scope of inclusive learning in distance education: Systematic literature review. Journal of Online Learning Studies, 2(1), 1–14.
Soysal, Y., & Türkmen, S. (2024). Reinterpreting the member checking validation strategy in qualitative research through the hermeneutics lens. Journal of Qualitative Research Methods, 2(1), 42–63.
Stambekova, A., Zhakipbekova, S., Tussubekova, K., Mazhinov, B., Shmidt, M., & Rymhanova, А. (2022). Education for the disabled in accordance with the quality of inclusive education in the distance education process. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(1), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i1.6760
Styles, I., & Radloff, A. (2001). The synergistic thesis: Student and supervisor perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770020030533
Turner, C., & Turner, K. D. (2017). The effects of educational delivery methods on knowledge retention. Journal of Education for Business, 92(5), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1331989
UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000177849
Vegliante, R., & Sannicandro, K. (2020). The role of the tutor in the university context and in distance learning: An exploratory research. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(3), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135274
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09792-3
White, A. E., Lincoln, B., Liang, B., Sepulveda, J., Matyjaszczyk, V., Kupersmith, C., Hill, N. E., & Perella, J. (2021). “My mentor thinks that I can be someone amazing”: Drawing out youths’ passions and purpose. Journal of Adolescent Research, 36(1), 98–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558420942481
Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 45–55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lidwina Sri Ardiasih, Audi Yundayani, Frimadhona Syafri, Rahmiaty, Meylina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
